Littles Weekly

Is Littles Weekly MCP server safe?

• No hidden instructions were found in its tool descriptions.
• Its error messages showed no secrets or internal details.
• 6 of its 7 tools are labeled read-only; the others may change or send things.
• Overall it scored 88/100 on 29 Oct 2026.

A test can only see what the server shows from outside, not what it does with your data behind the scenes. Connect servers from makers you trust.

What it can do

7 tools, in the server's own words.

Test results

Safe mode: only tools labeled read-only were run. How the test works

• !
  Ready for the newest MCP version

  1 warning

  • !Uses an older MCP version (2025-11-25). It works today, but it isn't on the July 2026 version (2026-07-28) yet.
  note
• !
  Every tool is described

  3 warnings

  • !list_pages: Inputs with no description: city
  • !get_page: Inputs with no description: city
  • !search: Inputs with no description: query
  note
• !
  Follows MCP best practices (not scored yet)

  2 tips (not scored)

  • !Very common tool name: search. Next to other servers' tools the AI may mix them up; a short prefix helps (like "github_search" instead of "search").
  • !2 tools answer with structured data but don't declare its shape (outputSchema): list_cities, search. If those answers change shape, nothing can catch it; with a schema, every answer is checked.
  note
• ✓
  ConnectsConnected in 277 ms
  pass
• ✓
  Lists its toolsFound 7 tools
  pass
• ✓
  Tools are labeled safe or dangerousEvery tool has a safety label
  pass
• ✓
  No hidden instructionsNo hidden instructions found in tool descriptions
  pass
• ✓
  Tools work with good inputs

  All good

  • ✓list_cities: Worked (42 ms)
  • ✓list_pages: Answered with an error, probably because of our sample input: No Littles Weekly city matches "test". Call list_cities for the 67 cities we cover.
  • ✓get_page: Answered with an error, probably because of our sample input: No Littles Weekly city matches "test". Call list_cities for the 67 cities we cover.
  • ✓get_events: Answered with an error, probably because of our sample input: No Littles Weekly city matches "test". Call list_cities for the 67 cities we cover.
  • ✓search: Worked (1.4 s)
  • ✓get_submission_status: Answered with an error, probably because of our sample input: { "ok": false, "message": "That doesn’t look like a submission ID. They look like ev-20261028-abcdefghjk." }
  • –submit_event: Not run: labeled as changing data
  pass
• ✓
  Bad inputs give a clean error

  All good

  • ✓list_pages: Refused missing required input "city" with a clear error
  • ✓get_page: Refused missing required input "city" with a clear error
  • ✓get_page: Refused wrong type for "section" with a clear error
  • ✓get_events: Refused missing required input "city" with a clear error
  • ✓get_events: Refused wrong type for "city" with a clear error
  • ✓search: Refused missing required input "query" with a clear error
  • ✓search: Refused wrong type for "query" with a clear error
  • ✓get_submission_status: Refused missing required input "id" with a clear error
  • and 1 more
  pass
• ✓
  Fast enough

  All good

  • ✓Connecting took 277 ms
  • ✓Listing tools took 53 ms
  • ✓Average tool answer: 262 ms
  • ✓search: Slowest tool: search (1.4 s)
  pass
• ✓
  No secrets leakedChecked 13 error messages: no secrets or internal details
  pass
• –
  Tools work togetherNo tool's answer could be fed into another tool, so there were no chains to test (not counted either way)
  not tested

Test it yourself

Free and open source. Same checks, same score.

Show this score on GitHub

Free for every server in the directory. Paste this into your README: the badge shows the score from our latest test.

Score over time

• 29 Oct 202688

One test so far. New tests will show here.

Reviews

Coming soon: reviews from people who use Littles Weekly, signed in with GitHub, one per person. Reviews never change the score.