Chris Pereira (彭家荣): China business expert

Is Chris Pereira (彭家荣): China business expert MCP server safe?

• None of the hidden-instruction wordings we know were found in its tool descriptions.
• 3 of its 4 tools are labeled read-only; the others may change or send things.
• Overall it scored 89/100 on 2 Nov 2026.

A test can only see what the server shows from outside, not what it does with your data behind the scenes. Connect servers from makers you trust.

What it can do

4 tools, in the server's own words.

Test results

Safe mode: only tools labeled read-only were run. How the test works

• !
  Ready for the newest MCP version

  1 warning

  • !Uses an older MCP version (2025-11-25). It works today, but it isn't on the July 2026 version (2026-07-28) yet.
  note
• !
  Bad inputs give a clean error

  2 warnings

  • !search_quotes: Accepted wrong type for "query" without complaining
  • !search_coverage: Accepted wrong type for "query" without complaining
  note
• !
  Follows MCP best practices (not scored yet)

  3 tips (not scored)

  • !1 tool not labeled read-only doesn't say whether running it twice is safe (idempotentHint): send_inquiry
  • !3 tools don't say whether they reach outside services like the web (openWorldHint): get_profile, search_quotes, search_coverage
  • !3 tools answer with structured data but don't declare its shape (outputSchema): get_profile, search_quotes, search_coverage. If those answers change shape, nothing can catch it; with a schema, every answer is checked.
  note
• ✓
  ConnectsConnected in 269 ms
  pass
• ✓
  Lists its toolsFound 4 tools
  pass
• ✓
  Every tool is describedAll 4 tools and their inputs are described
  pass
• ✓
  Tools are labeled safe or dangerousEvery tool has a safety label
  pass
• ✓
  No known hidden instructionsNone of the hidden-instruction wordings we know were found in tool descriptions. New wordings can get past this check.
  pass
• ✓
  Tools work with good inputs

  All good

  • ✓get_profile: Worked (204 ms)
  • ✓search_quotes: Worked (248 ms)
  • ✓search_coverage: Worked (171 ms)
  • –send_inquiry: Not run: labeled as changing data
  pass
• ✓
  Fast enough

  All good

  • ✓Connecting took 269 ms
  • ✓Listing tools took 37 ms
  • ✓Average tool answer: 208 ms
  • ✓search_quotes: Slowest tool: search_quotes (248 ms)
  pass
• –
  Tools work togetherNo tool's answer could be fed into another tool, so there were no chains to test (not counted either way)
  not tested
• –
  No secrets leakedNo error messages to check
  not tested

Test it yourself

Free and open source. Same checks, same score.

Show this score on GitHub

Free for every server in the directory. Paste this into your README: the badge shows the score from our latest test.

Score over time

• 2 Nov 202689

One test so far. New tests will show here.

Reviews

Coming soon: reviews from people who use Chris Pereira (彭家荣): China business expert, signed in with GitHub, one per person. Reviews never change the score.