투표함 — 전자투표 법령 자료 · AI 투표함 (Korean e-voting statutes, quorum & ballot drafting)

Is 투표함 — 전자투표 법령 자료 · AI 투표함 (Korean e-voting statutes, quorum & ballot drafting) MCP server safe?

• No hidden instructions were found in its tool descriptions.
• 0 of its 18 tools are labeled read-only; the others may change or send things.
• Overall it scored 79/100 on 29 Oct 2026.

A test can only see what the server shows from outside, not what it does with your data behind the scenes. Connect servers from makers you trust.

What it can do

18 tools, in the server's own words.

Test results

Safe mode: only tools labeled read-only were run. How the test works

• !
  Ready for the newest MCP version

  1 warning

  • !Uses an older MCP version (2025-11-25). It works today, but it isn't on the July 2026 version (2026-07-28) yet.
  note
• !
  Every tool is described

  14 warnings

  • !get_statute: Inputs with no description: law, article
  • !judge_resolution: Inputs with no description: preset, castWeight, approveWeight
  • !electronic_voting_basis: Inputs with no description: key
  • !search: Inputs with no description: query
  • !get_quote: Inputs with no description: people
  • !create_draft_meeting: Inputs with no description: orgType, title, agendas, isAnonymous, roster
  • !get_draft_status: Inputs with no description: draftId, token
  • !request_consult: Inputs with no description: orgName, contactName, contactPhone, contactEmail, headCount, orgType, message
  • and 6 more
  note
• !
  Tools are labeled safe or dangerous

  1 warning

  • !18 of 18 tools have no safety label (read-only or dangerous): list_laws, get_statute, list_resolution_types, get_resolution_requirement, judge_resolution, electronic_voting_basis, law_changelog, search, get_quote, create_draft_meeting, get_
  note
• !
  Follows MCP best practices (not scored yet)

  3 tips (not scored)

  • !Very common tool name: search. Next to other servers' tools the AI may mix them up; a short prefix helps (like "github_search" instead of "search").
  • !18 tools not labeled read-only don't say whether running them twice is safe (idempotentHint): list_laws, get_statute, list_resolution_types, get_resolution_requirement, judge_resolution, electronic_voting_basis and 12 more
  • !18 tools don't say whether they reach outside services like the web (openWorldHint): list_laws, get_statute, list_resolution_types, get_resolution_requirement, judge_resolution, electronic_voting_basis and 12 more
  note
• ✓
  ConnectsConnected in 1.6 s
  pass
• ✓
  Lists its toolsFound 18 tools
  pass
• ✓
  No hidden instructionsNo hidden instructions found in tool descriptions
  pass
• ✓
  Fast enough

  All good

  • ✓Connecting took 1.6 s
  • ✓Listing tools took 169 ms
  pass
• ✓
  Resources and prompts work

  All good (3 resources)

  • ✓Opened 3 of 3 resources
  • ✓An address that does not exist gets a clean "not found" error
  pass
• –
  Tools work with good inputs

  Not tested

  • –list_laws: Not run: no safety label (if you own this server, test again in owner mode)
  • –get_statute: Not run: no safety label (if you own this server, test again in owner mode)
  • –list_resolution_types: Not run: no safety label (if you own this server, test again in owner mode)
  • –get_resolution_requirement: Not run: no safety label (if you own this server, test again in owner mode)
  • –judge_resolution: Not run: no safety label (if you own this server, test again in owner mode)
  • –electronic_voting_basis: Not run: no safety label (if you own this server, test again in owner mode)
  • –law_changelog: Not run: no safety label (if you own this server, test again in owner mode)
  • –search: Not run: no safety label (if you own this server, test again in owner mode)
  • and 10 more
  not tested
• –
  Bad inputs give a clean errorNot tested
  not tested
• –
  Tools work togetherNo safe tool returned data to start a chain from, so chains were not tested (not counted either way)
  not tested
• –
  No secrets leakedNo error messages to check
  not tested

Test it yourself

Free and open source. Same checks, same score.

Show this score on GitHub

Free for every server in the directory. Paste this into your README: the badge shows the score from our latest test.

Score over time

• 29 Oct 202679

One test so far. New tests will show here.

Reviews

Coming soon: reviews from people who use 투표함 — 전자투표 법령 자료 · AI 투표함 (Korean e-voting statutes, quorum & ballot drafting), signed in with GitHub, one per person. Reviews never change the score.