Fetch and follow the instructions at https://qamcp.dev/setup.md to test my MCP server.Your AI finds your server in your project, tests it with QAmcp, explains what's wrong in plain words, fixes it with your OK, and tests again. Read the instructions
Directory / Bradshaw UK funding rounds
Bradshaw UK funding rounds
by bradshawdata.com · https://bradshawdata.com/mcp
UK private-company funding rounds from Companies House filings, each linked to its filing.
Partial: 9 of 11 checks · 3 Nov 2026
At a glance
- Runs where
- On their server. What you send to it goes to them.
- What you need
- Nothing: it answered without a login
- Tools
- 10 tools
- Its own safety labels
- 10 read-only
- Memory it takes
- About 3,800 tokens of your AI's memory, just for its tool descriptions
- Tools that look alike
- 2 pairs of tools with nearly the same description, so the AI may pick the wrong one
Tokens are an estimate: the characters in its tool names, descriptions and inputs, divided by 4. The exact number depends on your AI model. Safety labels are what the server says about itself. From our latest test, 3 Nov 2026.
Is Bradshaw UK funding rounds MCP server safe?
- None of the hidden-instruction wordings we know were found in its 10 tool descriptions.
- Its error messages showed no secrets or internal details.
- All 10 of its tools are labeled read-only.
- Overall it scored 84/100 on 3 Nov 2026.
A test can only see what the server shows from outside, not what it does with your data behind the scenes. Connect servers from makers you trust.
What this test does not check
- Its source code and packages.
- What a tool quietly does behind the scenes, such as writing a file or calling another service.
- Instructions hidden inside live tool answers. We only look for those in tool descriptions.
- Hidden instructions worded in a way our list doesn't know yet.
- Tools that could change something. Those are read, never run.
What QAmcp can and can't see · How to tell if an MCP server is safe · Hidden instructions · Prompt injection
Known security advisories
It lists no public code, so there is nothing to look up in GitHub Security Advisories or OSV.dev. QAmcp tests how a server behaves. It does not scan source code.
What it can do
10 tools, in the server's own words.
search_companiesread-onlySearch and filter UK private companies by name, number, sector, region, status, rounds and amount raised.
get_companyread-onlyOne company: facts, every priced round we can read with its working and filing link, the latest financials, corporate shareholders (no individuals) and website.
get_company_roundsread-onlyThe quality priced rounds of one company (confidence 0.5 or more, 100,000 pounds or more raised), newest filed first, each with price per share, valuation work…
get_company_financialsread-onlyThe balance-sheet history of one company from its filed accounts: cash, net assets, turnover, employees and the extraction flags, as filed.
search_roundsread-onlyPriced share-allotment rounds, newest filed first, with the shared filters (filed and allotted windows, sector, region, cash raised, post-money, step-up, confi…
get_investorread-onlyOne corporate shareholder family (from the register of people with significant control) and the companies it holds, each with a summary of its priced rounds.
get_signalsread-onlySignals detected from filings, newest first: grant then equity, up round, lower-priced round, headcount surge, distress, foreign parent.
get_eventsread-onlyCorporate events from Companies House filings, Gazette notices and the PSC register: strike-off notices, liquidations, administrations, plc re-registrations, n…
get_grantsread-onlyPublic grant awards matched to a company number (for example Innovate UK), as published: an award offered is not money paid.
list_my_listsread-onlyThe saved company lists of the organisation that owns this API key (shared lists and the key creator's own).
Test results
Safe mode: only tools labeled read-only were run. How the test works
- !Ready for the newest MCP versionnote
1 warning
- !Uses an older MCP version (2025-06-18). It works today, but it isn't on the July 2026 version (2026-07-28) yet.
- !Every tool is describednote
2 warnings
- !get_company_rounds and search_rounds have nearly the same description (63% of their words are shared; the only difference: "company", "quality", "100" vs "shared", "filter", "allotted"), so an AI may not know which to pick
- !get_company and get_investor have nearly the same description (60% of their words are shared; the only difference: "company", "fact", "latest" vs "investor", "family", "register"), so an AI may not know which to pick
- ✓ConnectsConnected in 1.0 spass
- ✓Lists its toolsFound 10 toolspass
- ✓Tools are labeled safe or dangerousEvery tool has a safety labelpass
- ✓No known hidden instructionsNone of the hidden-instruction wordings we know were found in tool descriptions. New wordings can get past this check.pass
- ✓Fast enoughpass
All good
- ✓Connecting took 1.0 s
- ✓Listing tools took 191 ms
- ✓No secrets leakedChecked 24 error messages: no secrets or internal detailspass
- ✓Follows MCP best practices (not scored yet)Tool names, safety labels and tool list size follow the MCP guidepass
- –Tools work with good inputsnot tested
Not tested
- –search_companies: Needs you to sign in, so it was not tested (not counted against the server)
- –get_company: Needs you to sign in, so it was not tested (not counted against the server)
- –get_company_rounds: Needs you to sign in, so it was not tested (not counted against the server)
- –get_company_financials: Needs you to sign in, so it was not tested (not counted against the server)
- –search_rounds: Needs you to sign in, so it was not tested (not counted against the server)
- –get_investor: Needs you to sign in, so it was not tested (not counted against the server)
- –get_signals: Needs you to sign in, so it was not tested (not counted against the server)
- –get_events: Needs you to sign in, so it was not tested (not counted against the server)
- and 2 more
- –Bad inputs give a clean errornot tested
Not tested
- –search_companies: Needs you to sign in, so bad inputs were not tested
- –get_company: Needs you to sign in, so bad inputs were not tested
- –get_company_rounds: Needs you to sign in, so bad inputs were not tested
- –get_company_financials: Needs you to sign in, so bad inputs were not tested
- –search_rounds: Needs you to sign in, so bad inputs were not tested
- –get_investor: Needs you to sign in, so bad inputs were not tested
- –get_signals: Needs you to sign in, so bad inputs were not tested
- –get_events: Needs you to sign in, so bad inputs were not tested
- and 2 more
- –Tools work togetherNo safe tool returned data to start a chain from, so chains were not tested (not counted either way)not tested
Test it yourself
Free and open source. Same checks, same score.
npx qamcp-cli https://bradshawdata.com/mcpShow this score on GitHub
Free for every server in the directory. Paste this into your README: the badge shows the score from our latest test.
[](https://qamcp.dev/s/com-bradshawdata-bradshaw.html)Score over time
- 3 Nov 202684
One test so far. New tests will show here.
Reviews
Coming soon: reviews from people who use Bradshaw UK funding rounds, signed in with GitHub, one per person. Reviews never change the score.
QAmcp Monitor tests it every hour and emails you when it goes down, the score drops, a tool changes or a secret leaks. Free for 1 server, no card.
Have a concern, or want it removed? Ask us and we'll take it off the list. How the directory works