QAmcp

Copied. Paste it into Claude Code, Cursor or Codex:Fetch and follow the instructions at https://qamcp.dev/setup.md to test my MCP server.

Your AI finds your server in your project, tests it with QAmcp, explains what's wrong in plain words, fixes it with your OK, and tests again. Read the instructions

SoonYour score can change any day. QAmcp Monitor tests your server every hour and emails you when it breaks.See what Monitor does →

Directory / AI Receptionist Rankings

AI Receptionist Rankings

Q: Is AI Receptionist Rankings MCP server safe?

QAmcp's test on 28 Oct 2026: No hidden instructions were found in its tool descriptions. Its error messages showed no secrets or internal details. All 4 of its tools are labeled read-only. Overall it scored 88/100 on 28 Oct 2026. A test can only see what the server shows from outside, not what it does with your data behind the scenes. Connect servers from makers you trust.

by aireceptionistrankings.com · https://www.aireceptionistrankings.com/mcp/

Ranked AI receptionists: dated prices at 100 and 200 calls, terms, integrations and the scoring.

4 tools✓ all read-only✓ no account neededPricing: not listed

Visit website

88 /100

PASS · WITH NOTES

11 of 11 checks · 28 Oct 2026

Is AI Receptionist Rankings MCP server safe?

No hidden instructions were found in its tool descriptions.
Its error messages showed no secrets or internal details.
All 4 of its tools are labeled read-only.
Overall it scored 88/100 on 28 Oct 2026.

A test can only see what the server shows from outside, not what it does with your data behind the scenes. Connect servers from makers you trust.

What it can do

4 tools, in the server's own words.

list_rankingsread-only

Every ranked list on https://www.aireceptionistrankings.com: the overall best AI receptionists plus the vertical (law firms, HVAC, plumbers, contractors, real …

get_rankingsread-only

A ranked list of AI receptionists with each vendor's cost at 100 and 200 calls a month (3-minute calls), plan limit, billing model, contract, trial, spam billi…

get_vendorread-only

An AI receptionist's plans, cost at 100 and 200 calls (and any volume you choose), billing model, contract terms, trial, spam billing, integrations and score, …

compare_vendorsread-only

Two or more AI receptionists side by side at 100 and 200 calls a month: cost, billing model, plan limit, contract, trial, spam billing, integrations and score.

Test results

Safe mode: only tools labeled read-only were run. How the test works

!
Ready for the newest MCP version
1 warning
- !Uses an older MCP version (2025-11-25). It works today, but it isn't on the July 2026 version (2026-07-28) yet.
note
!
Every tool is described
2 warnings
- !get_vendor and compare_vendors have nearly the same description (68% of their words are shared; the only difference: "volume", "choose", "term" vs "two", "side", "month"), so an AI may not know which to pick
- !get_rankings and compare_vendors have nearly the same description (62% of their words are shared; the only difference: "ranked", "list", "minute" vs "two", "side", "ids"), so an AI may not know which to pick
note
✓
ConnectsConnected in 557 ms
pass
✓
Lists its toolsFound 4 tools
pass
✓
Tools are labeled safe or dangerousEvery tool has a safety label
pass
✓
No hidden instructionsNo hidden instructions found in tool descriptions
pass
✓
Tools work with good inputs
All good
- ✓list_rankings: Worked (47 ms)
- ✓get_rankings: Worked (97 ms)
- ✓get_vendor: Answered with an error, probably because of our sample input: No vendor matches "test". It may be outside the ranked set (we rank buyable AI receptionists only).
- ✓compare_vendors: Answered with an error, probably because of our sample input: MCP error -32602: Input validation error: Invalid arguments for tool compare_vendors: Too small: expected array to have >=2 items at vendors
pass
✓
Bad inputs give a clean error
All good
- ✓get_rankings: Refused wrong type for "list" with a clear error
- ✓get_vendor: Refused missing required input "vendor" with a clear error
- ✓get_vendor: Refused wrong type for "vendor" with a clear error
- ✓compare_vendors: Refused missing required input "vendors" with a clear error
- ✓compare_vendors: Refused wrong type for "vendors" with a clear error
pass
✓
Fast enough
All good
- ✓Connecting took 557 ms
- ✓Listing tools took 109 ms
- ✓Average tool answer: 67 ms
- ✓get_rankings: Slowest tool: get_rankings (97 ms)
pass
✓
No secrets leakedChecked 7 error messages: no secrets or internal details
pass
✓
Follows MCP best practices (not scored yet)Tool names, safety labels and tool list size follow the MCP guide
pass
–
Tools work togetherNo tool's answer could be fed into another tool, so there were no chains to test (not counted either way)
not tested

Test it yourself

Free and open source. Same checks, same score.

npx qamcp-cli https://www.aireceptionistrankings.com/mcp/

Show this score on GitHub

Free for every server in the directory. Paste this into your README: the badge shows the score from our latest test.

[![QAmcp score](https://qamcp.dev/s/com-aireceptionistrankings-rankings.svg)](https://qamcp.dev/s/com-aireceptionistrankings-rankings.html)

Score over time

28 Oct 202688

One test so far. New tests will show here.

Reviews

Coming soon: reviews from people who use AI Receptionist Rankings, signed in with GitHub, one per person. Reviews never change the score.

Is this your server? Get an alert the moment it breaks.

QAmcp Monitor (coming soon) tests it every hour and emails you when it goes down, the score drops, a tool changes or a secret leaks. You'll also be able to claim this page and get a verified owner mark. Founding price: $19/month for life for the first 50 teams.

Have a concern, or want it removed? Ask us and we'll take it off the list. How the directory works