QAmcp

Copied. Paste it into Claude Code, Cursor or Codex:Fetch and follow the instructions at https://qamcp.dev/setup.md to test my MCP server.

Your AI finds your server in your project, tests it with QAmcp, explains what's wrong in plain words, fixes it with your OK, and tests again. Read the instructions

NewYour score can change any day. QAmcp Monitor tests your server every hour and emails you when it breaks. Free for 1 server.See what Monitor does →

Directory / Sitewalk

Sitewalk

Q: Is Sitewalk MCP server safe?

QAmcp's test on 3 Nov 2026: None of the hidden-instruction wordings we know were found in its tool descriptions. Its error messages showed no secrets or internal details. 2 of its 3 tools are labeled read-only; the others may change or send things. Overall it scored 88/100 on 3 Nov 2026. A test can only see what the server shows from outside, not what it does with your data behind the scenes. Connect servers from makers you trust.

by audit.adityaarsharma.com · https://audit.adityaarsharma.com/mcp

Technical SEO audits from ChatGPT or the web: health score, prioritised fixes, CSV and PDF reports.

3 tools✓ no account neededPricing: not listed

Visit website

88 /100

PASS · WITH NOTES

11 of 11 checks · 3 Nov 2026

Is Sitewalk MCP server safe?

None of the hidden-instruction wordings we know were found in its tool descriptions.
Its error messages showed no secrets or internal details.
2 of its 3 tools are labeled read-only; the others may change or send things.
Overall it scored 88/100 on 3 Nov 2026.

A test can only see what the server shows from outside, not what it does with your data behind the scenes. Connect servers from makers you trust.

What it can do

3 tools, in the server's own words.

start_site_audit

Use this when the user asks for a technical SEO audit, a site crawl, or a check for broken links, redirect problems, duplicate or missing titles and meta descr…

get_audit_statusread-only

Use this after start_site_audit to check whether the audit has finished.

get_audit_reportread-only

Use this once get_audit_status shows completed.

Test results

Safe mode: only tools labeled read-only were run. How the test works

!
Ready for the newest MCP version
1 warning
- !Uses an older MCP version (2025-11-25). It works today, but it isn't on the July 2026 version (2026-07-28) yet.
note
!
Every tool is described
3 warnings
- !start_site_audit: Inputs with no description: url
- !get_audit_status: Inputs with no description: audit_id
- !get_audit_report: Inputs with no description: audit_id, top_n
note
!
Follows MCP best practices (not scored yet)
1 tip (not scored)
- !1 tool not labeled read-only doesn't say whether running it twice is safe (idempotentHint): start_site_audit
note
✓
ConnectsConnected in 1.2 s
pass
✓
Lists its toolsFound 3 tools
pass
✓
Tools are labeled safe or dangerousEvery tool has a safety label
pass
✓
No known hidden instructionsNone of the hidden-instruction wordings we know were found in tool descriptions. New wordings can get past this check.
pass
✓
Tools work with good inputs
All good
- ✓get_audit_status: Answered with an error, probably because of our sample input: Error executing tool get_audit_status: No audit with that id.
- ✓get_audit_report: Answered with an error, probably because of our sample input: Error executing tool get_audit_report: No audit with that id.
- –start_site_audit: Not run: labeled as changing data
pass
✓
Bad inputs give a clean error
All good
- ✓get_audit_status: Refused missing required input "audit_id" with a clear error
- ✓get_audit_status: Refused wrong type for "audit_id" with a clear error
- ✓get_audit_report: Refused missing required input "audit_id" with a clear error
- ✓get_audit_report: Refused wrong type for "audit_id" with a clear error
pass
✓
Fast enough
All good
- ✓Connecting took 1.2 s
- ✓Listing tools took 132 ms
- ✓Average tool answer: 133 ms
- ✓get_audit_status: Slowest tool: get_audit_status (134 ms)
pass
✓
No secrets leakedChecked 6 error messages: no secrets or internal details
pass
–
Tools work togetherNo safe tool returned data to start a chain from, so chains were not tested (not counted either way)
not tested

Test it yourself

Free and open source. Same checks, same score.

npx qamcp-cli https://audit.adityaarsharma.com/mcp

Show this score on GitHub

Free for every server in the directory. Paste this into your README: the badge shows the score from our latest test.

[![QAmcp score](https://qamcp.dev/s/com-adityaarsharma-audit-sitewalk.svg)](https://qamcp.dev/s/com-adityaarsharma-audit-sitewalk.html)

Score over time

3 Nov 202688

One test so far. New tests will show here.

Reviews

Coming soon: reviews from people who use Sitewalk, signed in with GitHub, one per person. Reviews never change the score.

Is this your server? Get an alert the moment it breaks.

QAmcp Monitor tests it every hour and emails you when it goes down, the score drops, a tool changes or a secret leaks. Free for 1 server, no card.

Have a concern, or want it removed? Ask us and we'll take it off the list. How the directory works