Valuein — SEC EDGAR Fundamentals & Smart-Money Data

At a glance

Runs where

On their server. What you send to it goes to them.

What you need

Nothing: it answered without a login

Tools

111 tools

Its own safety labels

70 read-only, 14 labeled as deleting or destroying, 27 labeled as changing things

Memory it takes

About 65,900 tokens of your AI's memory, just for its tool descriptions

Largest answer

About 221.2 KB in our test

Tools that look alike

1 pair of tools with nearly the same description, so the AI may pick the wrong one

Speed

Average answer in our test: 863 ms

Tokens are an estimate: the characters in its tool names, descriptions and inputs, divided by 4. The exact number depends on your AI model. Safety labels are what the server says about itself. From our latest test, 9 Nov 2026.

Is Valuein — SEC EDGAR Fundamentals & Smart-Money Data MCP server safe?

• None of the hidden-instruction wordings we know were found in its 111 tool descriptions.
• Its error messages showed no secrets or internal details.
• 43 of its 60 tools are labeled read-only; the others may change or send things.
• Overall it scored 82/100 on 9 Nov 2026.

A test can only see what the server shows from outside, not what it does with your data behind the scenes. Connect servers from makers you trust.

What this test does not check

• Its source code and packages.
• What a tool quietly does behind the scenes, such as writing a file or calling another service.
• Instructions hidden inside live tool answers. We only look for those in tool descriptions.
• Hidden instructions worded in a way our list doesn't know yet.
• Tools that could change something. Those are read, never run.

What QAmcp can and can't see · How to tell if an MCP server is safe · Hidden instructions · Prompt injection

Known security advisories

None found in GitHub Security Advisories on 10 Nov 2026.

That means none were published there, not that there are no problems. QAmcp tests how a server behaves. It does not scan source code.

What it can do

60 tools, in the server's own words.

and 36 more

Test results

Safe mode: only tools labeled read-only were run. How the test works

• !
  Every tool is described

  7 warnings

  • !get_pit_universe: Description is very long (4478 characters), which uses up the AI's memory
  • !list_scheduled_tasks: Inputs with no description: limit
  • !list_rules: Inputs with no description: limit
  • !publish_report: Inputs with no description: report_id, visibility
  • !unpublish_report: Inputs with no description: report_id
  • !search_reports: Inputs with no description: sort, limit, cursor
  • !generate_dcf_xlsx and generate_lbo_xlsx have nearly the same description (75% of their words are shared; the only difference: "dcf", "forward", "sensitivity" vs "lbo", "year", "projection"), so an AI may not know which to pick
  note
• !
  Tools work with good inputs

  1 warning

  • !describe_schema: Answered with about 221 KB of text. Many AI apps cut off tool answers this big, so the AI may never see the end of it.
  • –get_insider_sentiment: The server limited our requests (HTTP 429), so it was not tested (not counted against the server)
  • –get_top_holders: The server limited our requests (HTTP 429), so it was not tested (not counted against the server)
  • –get_smart_money_flow: The server limited our requests (HTTP 429), so it was not tested (not counted against the server)
  • –list_citation_overrides: The server limited our requests (HTTP 429), so it was not tested (not counted against the server)
  • –list_figure_reviews: The server limited our requests (HTTP 429), so it was not tested (not counted against the server)
  • –verify_report_figures: The server limited our requests (HTTP 429), so it was not tested (not counted against the server)
  • –list_watchlists: The server limited our requests (HTTP 429), so it was not tested (not counted against the server)
  • and 32 more
  note
• !
  Fast enough

  1 warning

  • !list_restatements: Slowest tool: list_restatements (2.6 s): users will notice the wait
  • and 3 more
  note
• !
  Follows MCP best practices (not scored yet)

  2 tips (not scored)

  • !The tool list is about 1266 KB (roughly 317k tokens). AI apps send it with every message, so it takes that much of the AI's memory before any work starts.
  • !list_sops: Labeled read-only, but its "filter" input is a filter with no pattern, length limit or fixed choices. Make sure it can't reach outside what it's meant for (like a filter that matches everything), and add a pattern so AI apps know what fits.
  note
• !
  Resources and prompts work

  15 warnings (32 resources, 2 templates, 30 prompts)

  • !morning_briefing: Inputs with no description: watchlist_name, since
  • !earnings_pulse: Inputs with no description: ticker
  • !restatement_radar: Inputs with no description: watchlist_name, since
  • !earnings_war_room: Inputs with no description: ticker, as_of_date
  • !activist_radar: Inputs with no description: watchlist_name, lookback_days
  • !margin_and_moat_teardown: Could not open it with sample inputs: Invalid arguments for prompt margin_and_moat_teardown: ticker: Too big: expected string to have <=10 characters
  • !peer_benchmarking_memo: Could not open it with sample inputs: Invalid arguments for prompt peer_benchmarking_memo: ticker: Too big: expected string to have <=10 characters
  • !survivorship_free_backtest: Could not open it with sample inputs: Invalid arguments for prompt survivorship_free_backtest: index: Invalid input: expected "sp500"
  • and 11 more
  note
• ✓
  ConnectsConnected in 305 ms
  pass
• ✓
  Ready for the newest MCP versionUses the latest MCP version (2026-07-28)
  pass
• ✓
  Lists its toolsFound 111 tools
  pass
• ✓
  Tools are labeled safe or dangerousEvery tool has a safety label
  pass
• ✓
  No known hidden instructionsNone of the hidden-instruction wordings we know were found in tool descriptions. New wordings can get past this check.
  pass
• ✓
  Bad inputs give a clean error

  All good

  • ✓search_companies: Refused wrong type for "query" with a clear error
  • ✓get_company_fundamentals: Refused missing required input "ticker" with a clear error
  • ✓get_company_fundamentals: Refused wrong type for "ticker" with a clear error
  • ✓get_valuation_metrics: Refused missing required input "ticker" with a clear error
  • ✓get_valuation_metrics: Refused wrong type for "ticker" with a clear error
  • ✓get_financial_ratios: Refused missing required input "ticker" with a clear error
  • ✓get_financial_ratios: Refused wrong type for "ticker" with a clear error
  • ✓get_sec_filing_links: Refused missing required input "ticker" with a clear error
  • and 32 more
  pass
• ✓
  No secrets leakedChecked 151 error messages: no secrets or internal details
  pass
• –
  Tools work togetherNo tool's answer could be fed into another tool, so there were no chains to test (not counted either way)
  not tested

Test it yourself

Free and open source. Same checks, same score.

Show this score on GitHub

Free for every server in the directory. Paste this into your README: the badge shows the score from our latest test.

Score over time

• 9 Nov 202682

One test so far. New tests will show here.

Reviews

Coming soon: reviews from people who use Valuein — SEC EDGAR Fundamentals & Smart-Money Data, signed in with GitHub, one per person. Reviews never change the score.