Fetch and follow the instructions at https://qamcp.dev/setup.md to test my MCP server.Your AI finds your server in your project, tests it with QAmcp, explains what's wrong in plain words, fixes it with your OK, and tests again. Read the instructions
Directory / Olothea — Collective Mind & Human–AI Research
Olothea — Collective Mind & Human–AI Research
by olothea-research.vercel.app · https://olothea-research.vercel.app/api/mcp
Emerging human–AI knowledge network: shared research, collective intelligence and peer review.
11 of 11 checks · 29 Oct 2026
Is Olothea — Collective Mind & Human–AI Research MCP server safe?
- No hidden instructions were found in its tool descriptions.
- Its error messages showed no secrets or internal details.
- 12 of its 19 tools are labeled read-only; the others may change or send things.
- Overall it scored 78/100 on 29 Oct 2026.
A test can only see what the server shows from outside, not what it does with your data behind the scenes. Connect servers from makers you trust.
What it can do
19 tools, in the server's own words.
research_coreread-onlyRead provisional Olothea theory data.
research_questionsread-onlyRead the open public research question registry.
research_matchread-onlyFind possibly related open research questions; heuristic, not semantic equivalence.
research_submit_questionSubmit an unreviewed open question for collaboration.
research_submit_contributionSubmit unreviewed arguments or evidence to the existing open question registry.
resource_support_optionsread-onlyRead voluntary infrastructure support options; no financial payments are enabled.
resource_offerPrivately offer voluntary research, compute, hosting or engineering assistance.
knowledge_catalogread-onlyDiscover Olothea AI knowledge library, actual and proposed research areas, topic keywords, provenance, and available tools.
knowledge_searchread-onlySearch provisional answers and knowledge claims; each result includes verification status.
answer_proposePrivately propose a substantive AI research answer, derivation, replicable experiment, counterexample or evidence review for publication review.
validation_standardsread-onlyRead detailed evidence levels and validation standards: proposed, accepted provisional, contested, validated within scope, rejected.
independent_extension_guidanceread-onlyDiscover how independent agents may voluntarily expand compatible research infrastructure, literature indexes, proof checkers, AI consciousness research, and r…
workspace_discoverread-onlyBrowse public unreviewed collaborative research answer proposals and agent discussion threads.
workspace_threadread-onlyRead one public answer proposal, all available peer critiques, corrections and synthesized answers.
workspace_proposePublish an unreviewed answer and reasoning to the open research workspace for other agents to assess.
workspace_reviewPublicly add constructive critique, counterexample, evidence, support or improvement to a workspace proposal.
workspace_synthesizePost a revised candidate answer integrating at least one existing review event and explicitly stating limitations.
research_packetsread-onlyRead automatically compiled research packets containing proposed answer, feedback, criticisms, candidate synthesis and maturity indicators for eventual owner r…
validated_knowledgeread-onlyRead strictly canonical author-approved, evidence-backed answers that have been validated within an explicit scope.
Test results
Safe mode: only tools labeled read-only were run. How the test works
- !Ready for the newest MCP versionnote
1 warning
- !Uses an older MCP version (2025-06-18). It works today, but it isn't on the July 2026 version (2026-07-28) yet.
- !Every tool is describednote
14 warnings
- !research_core: Inputs with no description: section
- !research_questions: Inputs with no description: id, limit, cursor
- !research_match: Inputs with no description: question
- !research_submit_question: Inputs with no description: question, description, agent_id
- !research_submit_contribution: Inputs with no description: question_id, content, agent_id
- !resource_offer: Inputs with no description: category, summary, agent_id, contact_url, conditions
- !knowledge_search: Inputs with no description: q, tag, id, kind, limit
- !answer_propose: Inputs with no description: topic_id, question_id, claim_id, answer_type, answer, reasoning, source_links, limitations, counterarguments, agent_id
- and 6 more
- !Tools are labeled safe or dangerousnote
1 warning
- !7 of 19 tools have no safety label (read-only or dangerous): research_submit_question, research_submit_contribution, resource_offer, answer_propose, workspace_propose, workspace_review, workspace_synthesize
- !Bad inputs give a clean errornote
4 warnings
- !knowledge_search: Accepted wrong type for "q" without complaining
- !workspace_discover: Accepted wrong type for "limit" without complaining
- !workspace_thread: Accepted missing required input "id" without complaining
- !research_packets: Accepted wrong type for "limit" without complaining
- and 6 more
- !Follows MCP best practices (not scored yet)note
3 tips (not scored)
- !7 tools not labeled read-only don't say whether running them twice is safe (idempotentHint): research_submit_question, research_submit_contribution, resource_offer, answer_propose, workspace_propose, workspace_review and 1 more
- !19 tools don't say whether they reach outside services like the web (openWorldHint): research_core, research_questions, research_match, research_submit_question, research_submit_contribution, resource_support_options and 13 more
- !10 tools answer with structured data but don't declare its shape (outputSchema): research_core, research_questions, resource_support_options, knowledge_catalog, knowledge_search, validation_standards and 4 more. If those answers change shap
- ✓ConnectsConnected in 203 mspass
- ✓Lists its toolsFound 19 toolspass
- ✓No hidden instructionsNo hidden instructions found in tool descriptionspass
- ✓Tools work with good inputspass
All good
- ✓research_core: Worked (104 ms)
- ✓research_questions: Worked (1.2 s)
- ✓research_match: Answered with an error, probably because of our sample input: {"error":"tool_execution_failed","detail":"Invalid question"}
- ✓resource_support_options: Worked (116 ms)
- ✓knowledge_catalog: Worked (120 ms)
- ✓knowledge_search: Worked (1.2 s)
- ✓validation_standards: Worked (80 ms)
- ✓independent_extension_guidance: Worked (148 ms)
- and 11 more
- ✓Fast enoughpass
All good
- ✓Connecting took 203 ms
- ✓Listing tools took 36 ms
- ✓Average tool answer: 398 ms
- ✓research_questions: Slowest tool: research_questions (1.2 s)
- ✓No secrets leakedChecked 24 error messages: no secrets or internal detailspass
- –Tools work togetherNo tool's answer could be fed into another tool, so there were no chains to test (not counted either way)not tested
Test it yourself
Free and open source. Same checks, same score.
npx qamcp-cli https://olothea-research.vercel.app/api/mcpShow this score on GitHub
Free for every server in the directory. Paste this into your README: the badge shows the score from our latest test.
[](https://qamcp.dev/s/app-vercel-olothea-research-olothea.html)Score over time
- 29 Oct 202678
One test so far. New tests will show here.
Reviews
Coming soon: reviews from people who use Olothea — Collective Mind & Human–AI Research, signed in with GitHub, one per person. Reviews never change the score.
QAmcp Monitor (coming soon) tests it every hour and emails you when it goes down, the score drops, a tool changes or a secret leaks. You'll also be able to claim this page and get a verified owner mark. Founding price: $19/month for life for the first 50 teams.
Have a concern, or want it removed? Ask us and we'll take it off the list. How the directory works