Agent Ready Website Audit

At a glance

Runs where

On their server. What you send to it goes to them.

What you need

Nothing: it answered without a login

Tools

12 tools

Its own safety labels

11 read-only, 1 labeled as changing things

Memory it takes

About 5,200 tokens of your AI's memory, just for its tool descriptions

Largest answer

About 3.5 KB in our test

Speed

Average answer in our test: 292 ms

Tokens are an estimate: the characters in its tool names, descriptions and inputs, divided by 4. The exact number depends on your AI model. Safety labels are what the server says about itself. From our latest test, 7 Nov 2026.

Is Agent Ready Website Audit MCP server safe?

• None of the hidden-instruction wordings we know were found in its 12 tool descriptions.
• Its error messages showed no secrets or internal details.
• 11 of its 12 tools are labeled read-only; the others may change or send things.
• Overall it scored 94/100 on 7 Nov 2026.

A test can only see what the server shows from outside, not what it does with your data behind the scenes. Connect servers from makers you trust.

What this test does not check

• Its source code and packages.
• What a tool quietly does behind the scenes, such as writing a file or calling another service.
• Instructions hidden inside live tool answers. We only look for those in tool descriptions.
• Hidden instructions worded in a way our list doesn't know yet.
• Tools that could change something. Those are read, never run.

What QAmcp can and can't see · How to tell if an MCP server is safe · Hidden instructions · Prompt injection

Known security advisories

It lists no public code, so there is nothing to look up in GitHub Security Advisories or OSV.dev. QAmcp tests how a server behaves. It does not scan source code.

What it can do

12 tools, in the server's own words.

Test results

Safe mode: only tools labeled read-only were run. How the test works

• !
  Ready for the newest MCP version

  1 warning

  • !Uses an older MCP version (2025-11-25). It works today, but it isn't on the July 2026 version (2026-07-28) yet.
  note
• !
  Fast enough

  1 warning

  • !seo_audit_page: Slowest tool: seo_audit_page (2.1 s): users will notice the wait
  • and 3 more
  note
• !
  Follows MCP best practices (not scored yet)

  2 tips (not scored)

  • !1 tool not labeled read-only doesn't say whether running it twice is safe (idempotentHint): request_full_audit
  • !9 tools answer with structured data but don't declare its shape (outputSchema): seo_audit_page, check_robots_sitemap_llms_txt, check_ai_crawler_access, check_agent_readiness, compare_with_competitor_page, check_local_seo_details and 3 more.
  note
• ✓
  ConnectsConnected in 370 ms
  pass
• ✓
  Lists its toolsFound 12 tools
  pass
• ✓
  Every tool is describedAll 12 tools and their inputs are described
  pass
• ✓
  Tools are labeled safe or dangerousEvery tool has a safety label
  pass
• ✓
  No known hidden instructionsNone of the hidden-instruction wordings we know were found in tool descriptions. New wordings can get past this check.
  pass
• ✓
  Tools work with good inputs

  All good

  • ✓seo_audit_page: Worked (2.1 s)
  • ✓check_robots_sitemap_llms_txt: Worked (29 ms)
  • ✓check_ai_crawler_access: Worked (30 ms)
  • ✓check_agent_readiness: Worked (579 ms)
  • ✓compare_with_competitor_page: Worked (37 ms)
  • ✓check_local_seo_details: Worked (30 ms)
  • ✓draft_llms_txt: Worked (30 ms)
  • ✓draft_robots_txt_for_ai_crawlers: Worked (27 ms)
  • and 4 more
  pass
• ✓
  Bad inputs give a clean error

  All good

  • ✓seo_audit_page: Refused missing required input "url" with a clear error
  • ✓seo_audit_page: Refused wrong type for "url" with a clear error
  • ✓check_robots_sitemap_llms_txt: Refused missing required input "url" with a clear error
  • ✓check_robots_sitemap_llms_txt: Refused wrong type for "url" with a clear error
  • ✓check_ai_crawler_access: Refused missing required input "url" with a clear error
  • ✓check_ai_crawler_access: Refused wrong type for "url" with a clear error
  • ✓check_agent_readiness: Refused missing required input "url" with a clear error
  • ✓check_agent_readiness: Refused wrong type for "url" with a clear error
  • and 11 more
  pass
• ✓
  Tools work together

  5 chains working

  • ✓seo_audit_page → check_robots_sitemap_llms_txt: check_robots_sitemap_llms_txt found what seo_audit_page returned (url = "https://example.com/")
  • ✓seo_audit_page → check_ai_crawler_access: check_ai_crawler_access found what seo_audit_page returned (url = "https://example.com/")
  • ✓seo_audit_page → check_agent_readiness: check_agent_readiness found what seo_audit_page returned (url = "https://example.com/")
  • ✓seo_audit_page → compare_with_competitor_page: compare_with_competitor_page found what seo_audit_page returned (url = "https://example.com/")
  • ✓seo_audit_page → check_local_seo_details: check_local_seo_details found what seo_audit_page returned (url = "https://example.com/")
  pass
• ✓
  No secrets leakedChecked 25 error messages: no secrets or internal details
  pass
• ✓
  Resources and prompts workOpened 3 of 3 prompts
  pass

Test it yourself

Free and open source. Same checks, same score.

Show this score on GitHub

Free for every server in the directory. Paste this into your README: the badge shows the score from our latest test.

Score over time

• 7 Nov 202694

One test so far. New tests will show here.

Reviews

Coming soon: reviews from people who use Agent Ready Website Audit, signed in with GitHub, one per person. Reviews never change the score.