QAmcp

Copied. Paste it into Claude Code, Cursor or Codex:Fetch and follow the instructions at https://qamcp.dev/setup.md to test my MCP server.

Your AI finds your server in your project, tests it with QAmcp, explains what's wrong in plain words, fixes it with your OK, and tests again. Read the instructions

NewYour score can change any day. QAmcp Monitor keeps testing your server and emails you when it breaks. Free for 1 server.See what Monitor does →

Directory / reviewpaper.ai

reviewpaper.ai

Q: Is reviewpaper.ai MCP server safe?

QAmcp's test on 12 Nov 2026: None of the hidden-instruction wordings we know were found in its 7 tool descriptions. Its error messages showed no secrets or internal details. All 7 of its tools are labeled read-only. Overall it scored 93/100 on 12 Nov 2026. A test can only see what the server shows from outside, not what it does with your data behind the scenes. Connect servers from makers you trust.

by reviewpaper.ai · https://reviewpaper.ai/mcp

Review forms for 29 ML/NLP/CV venues, AI conference deadlines and ICLR acceptance odds.

7 tools✓ all read-only✓ no account neededPricing: on their site

See pricing →Visit website

93 /100

PASS · WITH NOTES

11 of 11 checks · 12 Nov 2026

Test it now for current results

At a glance

Runs where: On their server. What you send to it goes to them.
What you need: Nothing: it answered without a login
Tools: 7 tools
Its own safety labels: 7 read-only
Memory it takes: About 1,400 tokens of your AI's memory, just for its tool descriptions
Largest answer: About 3 KB in our test
Speed: Average answer in our test: 105 ms

Tokens are an estimate: the characters in its tool names, descriptions and inputs, divided by 4. The exact number depends on your AI model. Safety labels are what the server says about itself. From our latest test, 12 Nov 2026.

Is reviewpaper.ai MCP server safe?

None of the hidden-instruction wordings we know were found in its 7 tool descriptions.
Its error messages showed no secrets or internal details.
All 7 of its tools are labeled read-only.
Overall it scored 93/100 on 12 Nov 2026.

A test can only see what the server shows from outside, not what it does with your data behind the scenes. Connect servers from makers you trust.

What this test does not check

Its source code and packages.
What a tool quietly does behind the scenes, such as writing a file or calling another service.
Instructions hidden inside live tool answers. We only look for those in tool descriptions.
Hidden instructions worded in a way our list doesn't know yet.
Tools that could change something. Those are read, never run.

What QAmcp can and can't see · How to tell if an MCP server is safe · Hidden instructions · Prompt injection

Known security advisories

It lists no public code, so there is nothing to look up in GitHub Security Advisories or OSV.dev. QAmcp tests how a server behaves. It does not scan source code.

What it can do

7 tools, in the server's own words.

list_venuesread-only

List the 29 ML / NLP / CV / data-mining venues whose reviewer forms reviewpaper.ai models, with the overall score scale, whether the form is official or modele…

get_review_formread-only

The exact reviewer form for a venue: every field in order with guidance, each score scale with its official labels, the author checklist, the area-chair meta-r…

list_deadlinesread-only

Upcoming paper and abstract deadlines for ~64 ML, CV, NLP, robotics, speech, data-mining and AI conferences, soonest first, in AoE and ISO-8601 UTC.

get_deadlineread-only

Full timeline for one conference edition: abstract/registration, paper, author response and decision dates (AoE + ISO), plus links to its review form.

iclr_acceptance_oddsread-only

Historical ICLR acceptance rate for papers with similar reviewer ratings, from public OpenReview decisions (kernel estimate over past score profiles).

convert_scoreread-only

Map an overall review score at one venue to the same position on other venues' scales, keeping its distance from each venue's rough acceptance bar.

get_llm_policyread-only

What a venue allows authors and reviewers to do with LLMs, with the official policy link.

Test results

Safe mode: only tools labeled read-only were run. How the test works

!
Every tool is described
1 warning
- !list_deadlines: Inputs with no description: limit
note
✓
ConnectsConnected in 382 ms
pass
✓
Ready for the newest MCP versionUses the latest MCP version (2026-07-28)
pass
✓
Lists its toolsFound 7 tools
pass
✓
Tools are labeled safe or dangerousEvery tool has a safety label
pass
✓
No known hidden instructionsNone of the hidden-instruction wordings we know were found in tool descriptions. New wordings can get past this check.
pass
✓
Tools work with good inputs
All good
- ✓list_venues: Worked (88 ms)
- ✓get_review_form: Answered with an error, probably because of our sample input: Unknown venue "test". Known: neurips, iclr, icml, aistats, uai, tmlr, colt, acl-rolling-review, emnlp, naacl, coling, eacl, aacl, colm, cvp…
- ✓list_deadlines: Worked (209 ms)
- ✓get_deadline: Answered with an error, probably because of our sample input: No tracked conference matches "test". Use list_deadlines to see what's tracked.
- ✓iclr_acceptance_odds: Answered with an error, probably because of our sample input: Input validation error: Invalid arguments for tool iclr_acceptance_odds: scores: Too small: expected array to have >=3 items
- ✓convert_score: Answered with an error, probably because of our sample input: Unknown venue "test". Known: neurips, iclr, icml, aistats, uai, tmlr, colt, acl-rolling-review, emnlp, naacl, coling, eacl, aacl, colm, cvp…
- ✓get_llm_policy: Answered with an error, probably because of our sample input: Unknown venue "test". Known: neurips, iclr, icml, aistats, uai, tmlr, colt, acl-rolling-review, emnlp, naacl, coling, eacl, aacl, colm, cvp…
pass
✓
Bad inputs give a clean error
All good
- ✓list_venues: Refused wrong type for "area" with a clear error
- ✓get_review_form: Refused missing required input "venue" with a clear error
- ✓get_review_form: Refused wrong type for "venue" with a clear error
- ✓list_deadlines: Refused wrong type for "area" with a clear error
- ✓get_deadline: Refused missing required input "conference" with a clear error
- ✓get_deadline: Refused wrong type for "conference" with a clear error
- ✓iclr_acceptance_odds: Refused missing required input "scores" with a clear error
- ✓iclr_acceptance_odds: Refused wrong type for "scores" with a clear error
- and 4 more
pass
✓
Fast enough
All good
- ✓Connecting took 382 ms
- ✓Listing tools took 175 ms
- ✓Average tool answer: 105 ms
- ✓list_deadlines: Slowest tool: list_deadlines (209 ms)
pass
✓
No secrets leakedChecked 17 error messages: no secrets or internal details
pass
✓
Follows MCP best practices (not scored yet)Tool names, safety labels and tool list size follow the MCP guide
pass
–
Tools work togetherNo tool's answer could be fed into another tool, so there were no chains to test (not counted either way)
not tested

Test it yourself

Free and open source. Same checks, same score.

npx qamcp-cli https://reviewpaper.ai/mcp

Show this score on GitHub

Free for every server in the directory. Paste this into your README: the badge shows the score from our latest test.

[![QAmcp score](https://qamcp.dev/s/ai-reviewpaper-reviewpaper.svg)](https://qamcp.dev/s/ai-reviewpaper-reviewpaper.html)

Score over time

12 Nov 202693

One test so far. New tests will show here.

Reviews

Coming soon: reviews from people who use reviewpaper.ai, signed in with GitHub, one per person. Reviews never change the score.

Is this your server? Get an alert the moment it breaks.

QAmcp Monitor tests it every hour and emails you when it goes down, the score drops, a tool changes or a secret leaks. Free for 1 server, no card.

Have a concern, or want it removed? Ask us and we'll take it off the list. How the directory works