QAmcp

Copied. Paste it into Claude Code, Cursor or Codex:Fetch and follow the instructions at https://qamcp.dev/setup.md to test my MCP server.

Your AI finds your server in your project, tests it with QAmcp, explains what's wrong in plain words, fixes it with your OK, and tests again. Read the instructions

NewYour score can change any day. QAmcp Monitor keeps testing your server and emails you when it breaks. Free for 1 server.See what Monitor does →

Directory / ListPlus

ListPlus

Q: Is ListPlus MCP server safe?

QAmcp's test on 7 Nov 2026: None of the hidden-instruction wordings we know were found in its 6 tool descriptions. Its error messages showed no secrets or internal details. 4 of its 6 tools are labeled read-only; the others may change or send things. Overall it scored 88/100 on 7 Nov 2026. A test can only see what the server shows from outside, not what it does with your data behind the scenes. Connect servers from makers you trust.

by listplus.ai · https://listplus.ai/mcp

Check contact data with 100+ quality checks, find B2B contacts, fill work e-mail and mobile.

6 tools✓ no account neededPricing: on their site

See pricing →Visit website

88 /100

PASS · WITH NOTES

11 of 11 checks · 7 Nov 2026

Test it now for current results

At a glance

Runs where: On their server. What you send to it goes to them.
What you need: Nothing: it answered without a login
Tools: 6 tools
Its own safety labels: 4 read-only, 2 labeled as changing things
Memory it takes: About 1,600 tokens of your AI's memory, just for its tool descriptions
Largest answer: About 12.8 KB in our test
Speed: Average answer in our test: 260 ms

Tokens are an estimate: the characters in its tool names, descriptions and inputs, divided by 4. The exact number depends on your AI model. Safety labels are what the server says about itself. From our latest test, 7 Nov 2026.

Is ListPlus MCP server safe?

None of the hidden-instruction wordings we know were found in its 6 tool descriptions.
Its error messages showed no secrets or internal details.
4 of its 6 tools are labeled read-only; the others may change or send things.
Overall it scored 88/100 on 7 Nov 2026.

A test can only see what the server shows from outside, not what it does with your data behind the scenes. Connect servers from makers you trust.

What this test does not check

Its source code and packages.
What a tool quietly does behind the scenes, such as writing a file or calling another service.
Instructions hidden inside live tool answers. We only look for those in tool descriptions.
Hidden instructions worded in a way our list doesn't know yet.
Tools that could change something. Those are read, never run.

What QAmcp can and can't see · How to tell if an MCP server is safe · Hidden instructions · Prompt injection

Known security advisories

It lists no public code, so there is nothing to look up in GitHub Security Advisories or OSV.dev. QAmcp tests how a server behaves. It does not scan source code.

What it can do

6 tools, in the server's own words.

what_can_you_doread-only

FREE — what ListPlus can do for you: every action, the fields we can fill with their price per record, the free limits, and (with a key) your balance and day b…

find_personread-only

FREE (rate-limited) — find a person: name, job title, company, location, LinkedIn profile, how sure.

check_recordsread-only

FREE (up to 25 records without a key, 1000 with one) — check contact records for errors with 100+ checks: typos in e-mail domains, role mailboxes (office@), du…

enrich_records

PAID (needs a key) — per record from a name + company: work e-mail ≈2.39, at most 9 credits; mobile ≈3.84, at most 12; job title ≈1.41, at most 13.5.

get_jobread-only

FREE (key) — the state of an enrich_records job; when it ended, the records with the fields we found (in the order you sent them).

verify_email

PAID (needs a key) — 0.3 credits per address (an address checked in the last 7 days costs nothing): is the e-mail address deliverable (valid, invalid, catch_al…

Test results

Safe mode: only tools labeled read-only were run. How the test works

!
Ready for the newest MCP version
1 warning
- !Uses an older MCP version (2025-03-26). It works today, but it isn't on the July 2026 version (2026-07-28) yet.
note
!
Every tool is described
3 warnings
- !find_person: Inputs with no description: first_name, last_name, company, domain, linkedin_url, query
- !get_job: Inputs with no description: job_id
- !verify_email: Inputs with no description: emails
note
!
Follows MCP best practices (not scored yet)
1 tip (not scored)
- !2 tools not labeled read-only don't say whether running them twice is safe (idempotentHint): enrich_records, verify_email
note
✓
ConnectsConnected in 831 ms
pass
✓
Lists its toolsFound 6 tools
pass
✓
Tools are labeled safe or dangerousEvery tool has a safety label
pass
✓
No known hidden instructionsNone of the hidden-instruction wordings we know were found in tool descriptions. New wordings can get past this check.
pass
✓
Tools work with good inputs
All good
- ✓what_can_you_do: Worked (320 ms)
- ✓find_person: Answered with an error, probably because of our sample input: { "ok": false, "action": "find_person", "error": { "code": "missing_input", "message": "Send a name with a company (or domain), a LinkedIn …
- ✓check_records: Worked (236 ms)
- –get_job: Needs you to sign in, so it was not tested (not counted against the server)
- –enrich_records: Not run: labeled as changing data
- –verify_email: Not run: labeled as changing data
pass
✓
Bad inputs give a clean error
All good
- ✓what_can_you_do: Refused wrong type for "language" with a clear error
- ✓find_person: Refused wrong type for "first_name" with a clear error
- ✓check_records: Refused missing required input "records" with a clear error
- ✓check_records: Refused wrong type for "records" with a clear error
- –get_job: Needs you to sign in, so bad inputs were not tested
pass
✓
Fast enough
All good
- ✓Connecting took 831 ms
- ✓Listing tools took 288 ms
- ✓Average tool answer: 260 ms
- ✓what_can_you_do: Slowest tool: what_can_you_do (320 ms)
pass
✓
No secrets leakedChecked 8 error messages: no secrets or internal details
pass
–
Tools work togetherNo tool's answer could be fed into another tool, so there were no chains to test (not counted either way)
not tested

Test it yourself

Free and open source. Same checks, same score.

npx qamcp-cli https://listplus.ai/mcp

Show this score on GitHub

Free for every server in the directory. Paste this into your README: the badge shows the score from our latest test.

[![QAmcp score](https://qamcp.dev/s/ai-listplus-listplus.svg)](https://qamcp.dev/s/ai-listplus-listplus.html)

Score over time

7 Nov 202688

One test so far. New tests will show here.

Reviews

Coming soon: reviews from people who use ListPlus, signed in with GitHub, one per person. Reviews never change the score.

Is this your server? Get an alert the moment it breaks.

QAmcp Monitor tests it every hour and emails you when it goes down, the score drops, a tool changes or a secret leaks. Free for 1 server, no card.

Have a concern, or want it removed? Ask us and we'll take it off the list. How the directory works