Booqer

Is Booqer MCP server safe?

• No hidden instructions were found in its tool descriptions.
• Its error messages showed no secrets or internal details.
• 6 of its 8 tools are labeled read-only; the others may change or send things.
• Overall it scored 91/100 on 21 Oct 2026.

A test can only see what the server shows from outside, not what it does with your data behind the scenes. Connect servers from makers you trust.

What it can do

8 tools, in the server's own words.

Test results

Safe mode: only tools labeled read-only were run. How the test works

• !
  Ready for the newest MCP version

  1 warning

  • !Uses an older MCP version (2025-06-18). It works today, but it isn't on the July 2026 version (2026-07-28) yet.
  note
• !
  Resources and prompts work

  1 warning (1 resource)

  • !1 of 1 resources have no description, so people can't tell what they contain.
  • and 2 more
  note
• ✓
  ConnectsConnected in 1.3 s
  pass
• ✓
  Lists its toolsFound 8 tools
  pass
• ✓
  Every tool is describedAll 8 tools and their inputs are described
  pass
• ✓
  Tools are labeled safe or dangerousEvery tool has a safety label
  pass
• ✓
  No hidden instructionsNo hidden instructions found in tool descriptions
  pass
• ✓
  Tools work with good inputs

  All good

  • ✓search_businesses: Worked (323 ms)
  • ✓get_business: Answered with an error, probably because of our sample input: Unknown shop_id. Call search_businesses to find a shop id. {"error":"Unknown shop_id. Call search_businesses to find a shop id."}
  • ✓resolve_business: Answered with an error, probably because of our sample input: Missing required field. Provide domain, place, or phone for resolve_business. For a text query, call search_businesses. {"error":"Missing r…
  • ✓check_availability: Answered with an error, probably because of our sample input: Missing required field 'start'. Use an ISO-8601 timestamp, for example 2026-10-20T14:00:00-04:00. {"error":"Missing required field 'start'.…
  • ✓get_booking_status: Answered with an error, probably because of our sample input: {"found":false,"error":"Missing or invalid field 'request_id'. Use the id returned by request_booking."} {"found":false,"error":"Missing or…
  • ✓request_service: Answered with an error, probably because of our sample input: Shop not found. {"error":"Shop not found."}
  • –request_booking: Not run: labeled dangerous
  • –submit_service_request: Not run: labeled dangerous
  pass
• ✓
  Bad inputs give a clean error

  All good

  • ✓search_businesses: Refused missing required input "query" with a clear error
  • ✓search_businesses: Refused wrong type for "query" with a clear error
  • ✓get_business: Refused missing required input "shop_id" with a clear error
  • ✓get_business: Refused wrong type for "shop_id" with a clear error
  • ✓resolve_business: Refused wrong type for "domain" with a clear error
  • ✓check_availability: Refused missing required input "shop_id" with a clear error
  • ✓check_availability: Refused wrong type for "shop_id" with a clear error
  • ✓get_booking_status: Refused missing required input "request_id" with a clear error
  • and 3 more
  pass
• ✓
  Fast enough

  All good

  • ✓Connecting took 1.3 s
  • ✓Listing tools took 403 ms
  • ✓Average tool answer: 275 ms
  • ✓search_businesses: Slowest tool: search_businesses (323 ms)
  pass
• ✓
  No secrets leakedChecked 16 error messages: no secrets or internal details
  pass
• –
  Tools work togetherNo tool's answer could be fed into another tool, so there were no chains to test (not counted either way)
  not tested

Test it yourself

Free and open source. Same checks, same score.

Score over time

• 21 Oct 202691

One test so far. New tests will show here.

Reviews

Coming soon: reviews from people who use Booqer, signed in with GitHub, one per person. Reviews never change the score.